PREMJIT SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) VINOD Prasad, J. Heard Sri Satish Chaturvedi, learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA in opposition.

(2.) THE applicant has prayed for quashing of the order dated 8. 8. 2007 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C. refusing to direct registration of FIR and investigation of the offence.

(3.) ALLEGED that the accused persons not being a member of SC/st intentionally insulted and intimidated the applicant with the intention to humiliate him on 8/9th July, 2007 within the public view and they also gave false and frivolous information to the public servants who then use their lawful power to the annoyance the member of the SC/st and resultantly the proposed accused have committed offence under Section 3 of SC/st (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. It was, therefore, prayed that the accused persons have committed offences under Sections 341, 379, 506, I. PC. and Section 3 SC/st (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Wielding the power of the Magistrate under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C. it was prayed that the FIR be got registered against the accused persons and the investigation be ordered.