KALAWATI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ALOK K. Singh, J. Two electrostat copies of the order dated 4. 6. 2008 and or der dated 2. 6. 2008 passed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice D. V. Sharma in Crl. Appeal No. 1214 of 2008 and in Crl. Appeal No. 1185 of 2008 submitted today for perusal of this Court, are taken on record.

(2.) APPEAL has already been admit ted.

(3.) IT is submitted on behalf of the appellant that the husband as also the fa ther-in-law have already been enlarged on bail by means of the aforesaid two orders. Concededly the allegations against the fa ther-in-law and mother-in-law are similar. Therefore, the bail is prayed on the ground of parity itself. IT is also said that during the pendency of trial the appellant was on bail which she has never misused. Learned Counsel for the appellant further submits that speedy justice is the fundamental right of the appellant but the appeal is likely to take few years more in its final disposal.