PANKAJALIASGOLU Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) VINOD Prasad, J. Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and the learned A. G. A.

(2.) THE applicants, through the present application under Section 482, Cr. P. C. have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with the prayer that the pro ceeding of Criminal Case No. 1672 of 2007, State v. Pankaj @ Golu and another, pending in the Court of A. C. J. M. , Court No. 3, Allahabad, under Sections 363, 366, 368 and 376, IPC, Case Crime No. 90 of 2007, P. S. Cantl, District Allahabad be quashed.

(3.) AFTER hearing learned AGA and looking into the relationship and the prayer made by the respondent No. 2 Ram Sajeevan, who is the aggrieved person, lam of the opinion that in the interest of justice, it will be a wastage of time to allow the prosecution of Case No. 1672 of 2007 State v. Pankaj @ Golu and another, pending in the Court of A. C. J. M. , Court No. 3, Allahabad, under Sections 363, 366, 368 and 376, IPC, Case Crime No. 90 of 2007, P. S. Cantl, District Allahabad to go on as that will only amount to harassment of the parties and wastage of the time of the Court.