VIJAY CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) AMAR Saran, J. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant.

(2.) THIS application under section 482 Cr. P. C. has been filed praying for quashing of the order dated 21. 1. 2008 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate 9th, Kanpur Nagar, in case No. 650 of 2006, arising out of case crime No. 289 of 1999, under sections 420, 468, 471, 386, 506 IPC, PS Nawabganj, District Kanpur Nagar and for a direction to the Trial Court to close evidence and to proceed further.

(3.) LOOKING to the gravity of the alle gations, the Trial Court observed that without giving further opportunity to the prosecution to bring its evidence on record and the proceedings cannot be terminated and looking to the directions of the High Court on the next occasion the prosecution should ensure the presence of their witnesses and that learned Counsel for the accused should also be present in the Court.