UNION OF INDIA Vs. SURENDRA PAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Tej Prakash, learned Standing Counsel for the Union of India and Ms. Tulika Prakash, learned Counsel appearing for the plaintiff/respondent.

(2.) THE instant second appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 6.1.1995 passed by 10th Additional District Judge, Ghaziabad, in civil appeal No. 34 of 1993, Union of India v. Surendra Pal, confirming the judg­ment and decree dated 15.2.1993 passed by the Civil Judge, Ghaziabad, in suit No. 1449 of 1990.

(3.) THE defendant-appellant filed his written statement denying claim of the plaintiff stating therein that there are no constructions. The disputed land was acquired by the Union of India for the Ordnance Factory. The ancestor of the plaintiff has already received compensation and the disputed land is part and parcel of the ordnance factory, Muradnagar.