AAMANA KHATOON Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -The petitioner was elected as Senior Up-Pramukh on 27.2.2006. It appears that a no-confidence motion against the Pramukh was passed on 30.4.2008. The District Magistrate passed an order dated 27.5.2008 appointing a three-members committee to discharge the functions of the Pramukh until fresh elections are held. This order dated 27.5.2008 has been challenged by the petitioner.

(2.) WE have heard Sri L. P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri K. N. Tripathi, senior advocate, assisted by Sri N. K. Pandey on behalf of respondent No. 4 and learned standing counsel.

(3.) IF this amended provision is applied the District Magistrate was competent to appoint the three member committee. According to the petitioner the amended Section 9 does not apply and this result has been brought about by Sections 9 and 10 of the Amendment Act.