CHHUNNU ALIAS CHHIDDA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAVINDRA Singh, J. This appli cation has been filed by the applicant Chhunnu @ Chhidda with a prayer that he may be released on bail in case Crime No. 347 of 2007 under sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 302 I. P. C. , P. S. Asmoli, District Moradabad.

(2.) HEARD Sri S. M. A. Kazmi, learned senior Advocate assisted by Sri S. M. Iqbal Hasan, learned Counsel for the applicant, learned A. G. A. for the State of U. P. and Sri Sunil Kumar Rai, Sri Rupak Chaubey and Sri S. A. Shah, learned Counsel for the complainant.

(3.) IN reply of the above contention, it is submitted by learned A. G. A. and learned Counsel for the complainant that the appli cant and another co-accused persons in a pre-planned manner have committed the alleged offence. IN cross case the final re port has been submitted because the in jured of the cross case stated during inves tigation that they had sustained injuries due to firing done by the applicant side but in its rejoinder-affidavit it is submitted af fidavit by learned Counsel for the applicant that no such statement has been re corded/in the investigation of this case. It is further contended by learned Counsel for the complainant that in case the applicant is released on bail, he shall tamper with the evidence, therefore, he may not be released on bail.