(1.) S. U. Khan, J. This writ petition was earlier allowed and matter was re manded to the Revisional Court through judgment and order dated 8. 12. 2004. Thereafter, the said order was set aside on the rehearing application filed by the respondents as it had been passed without hearing any one on behalf of re spondents.
(2.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.
(3.) IT is mentioned in the judgment of the Trial Court that as in the written statement (Para 8) month was not mentioned hence tenant was defaulter. In the written statement it had further been stated that at the time of service of no tice rent for only one month i. e. , August, 1975 was due. Trial Court held that as notice was served on 6. 8. 1975 hence rent of August could not be due by that time.