ANSHU BHARTI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri A. P. Tiwari for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

(2.) AS agreed by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being heard and decided finally at this stage under the Rules of the Court since the issue raised by the petitioner is purely legal and, therefore, the learned Standing Counsel does not propose to file any counter affidavit, but has opposed the writ petition by making oral submissions.

(3.) LEARNED Standing Counsel, on the con trary, stated that from the order of suspension, it is evident that the petitioner used to remain absent and this constitute a miscon duct and, therefore, she has been rightly placed under suspension. It is also pointed out that charge sheet having issued on 10-9-2007, at the best, the authorities may be directed to complete departmental enquiry expeditiously.