DEENA NATH Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ASHOK Bhushan, J. Heard Sri Rahul Sahai, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sanjay Singh, learned Counsel appearing for the contesting respondent No. 2.

(2.) BY this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 13. 2. 2008, passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ballia holding the revision filed by the respondents against the order dated 27. 9. 2007 of the Settlement Officer, Consolidation as maintainable.

(3.) SRI Sanjay Singh, learned Counsel for the contesting respondents refuting the submission of learned Counsel for the petitioners, contended that appeal having been finally allowed by the Settlement Officer, Consolidation after setting aside the order of the Consolidation Officer, the order of the appellate Court is not an interlocutory order and the revision was ly maintainable. He further submits that according to Section 48 Explanation (3), the Deputy Director of Consolida tion has very wide power and the revision is ly maintainable.