MURLI MANOHAR Vs. U.P.SUGAR COMPANY LTD.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE opposite party is represented through Sri C.B. Gupta and with the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage itself without calling for a counter affidavit since no factual controversy is involved.

(2.) HEARD Sri H.N. Singh, the learned counsel for the defendant/petitioner and Sri C.B. Gupta, the learned counsel for the plaintiff/respondent.

(3.) IT is alleged that the written statement was eventually filed when the Court started functioning on 29.9.07 which was opposed by the plaintiff and consequently by the impugned order dated 30.8.08, the trial Court rejected the application of the petitioner to keep the written statement on the record on the ground that there has been a substantial delay in filing the written statement. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the said order, filed a, revision which was also dismissed and consequently, the present writ petition has been filed.