RAJESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -This is an application under Section 482, Cr. P.C., to quash the summoning order dated 23.2.2007 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Atrauli, Aligarh in complaint Case No. 468 of 2007, Prem Pal Singh v. Rajesh Kumar and others, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B, I.P.C. P.S. Atrauli, District Aligarh pending in his Court.

(2.) THE facts relevant for disposal of this application are that, the complainant opposite party No. 2 filed a complaint against the accused applicants and the then Village Development Officer under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B, I.P.C. stating therein that accused applicants No. 1 and 2 are Gram Pradhan of Village Ganiawali, P.S.-Atrauli and accused applicant No. 3 Satish Chandra is a member of the Block Development Committee. It has been alleged that all the accused hatched a conspiracy and prepared B.P.L. ration cards of 10 persons mentioned in the complaint who have sufficient land with them, and they are not below the poverty line. It was also alleged that photographs of some other persons were affixed on the ration cards of these persons. THE complainant besides examining himself under Section 200, Cr. P.C., produced Idrish, Kurban Ali and Rameshwar under Section 202, Cr. P.C., Idrish stated that the accused had obtained his photograph and affixed it on the ration card of Om Prakash, and in the ration cards, interpolations were made in respect of names of ration card holders. After recording statement of the complainant and witnesses under Section 200 and 202, Cr. P.C., the learned Magistrate was of the view that the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B, I.P.C. were made out against the accused persons. He therefore, summoned the accused for the above offences. Against that order, Rajesh Kumar, his wife Kaushalya Devi, and Satish Chandra alias Satish Kumar (accused applicants No. 1 to 3) have filed this application under Section 482, Cr. P.C.

(3.) THE accused have also taken a plea that they are Gram Pradhan and member of Block Development Committee. It has also been alleged that it was the duty of the Gram Vikas Adhikari to prepare a list of the persons entitled to ration card of the category below poverty line. It was also contended that the accused applicants are public servants and if they prepared or issued wrong ration cards in favour of those persons who are not entitled for it, this act was done by them while discharging their duties as a public servant and so sanction under Section 197, Cr. P.C., is also essential for their prosecution but the learned Magistrate had taken cognizance against them without that sanction and so the order passed by him is vitiated.