TARA DEVI Vs. VTH ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE GORAKHPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. U. Khan, J. Inspite of sufficient service as held by order dated 7. 11. 1998, no one has appeared on behalf of the contesting respondent No. 2.

(2.) HEARD learned Counsel for the petitioner.

(3.) IN my opinion, the view taken by Lower Appellate Court is absolutely correct. Decretal amount includes pendent lite and future damages/rent also.