ABDUL RASEED ALIAS KALLU Vs. NAZAMA BEGAM

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. U. Khan, J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner.

(2.) THIS is tenant's writ petition arising out of eviction/release proceedings initiated by landlady respondent on the ground of bona fide need under section 21 of U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 in the form of Case No. 14 of 2005. Prescribed Authority/additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kanpur Nagar, through judgment and order dated 18. 1. 2008 allowed the release application. Against the said judgment and or der, tenant petitioner filed Rent Appeal No. 29 of 2008, which was dismissed by A. D. J. /special Judge (E. G. Act), Kanpur Nagar on 22. 7. 2008, hence this writ petition.

(3.) IN respect of comparative hardship, Courts below found that tenant did not make any efforts to search alternative accommodation, hence question of hardship had to be decided against him. I do not find least error in the concur rent findings of the Courts below. Courts below allowed the release application under section 21 (1) (a) of the Act.