PRADEEP KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ASHOK Bhushan, J. Heard Sri R. K. Shukla learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Jitendra Pal Singh Chauhan learned Counsel appearing for re spondents No. 6 and 7 and learned Standing Counsel.

(2.) BY this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to permit the petitioner to appear in B. T. C. Corre spondence Course in the year 2007 in pursuance of the Government order dated 27th December, 2004. It has further been prayed that respondents be commanded to take action against respondents No. 6 and 7 as they have deleted the name of the petitioner from the letter dated 24th July, 1995 and inserted the name of Dharmendra Kumar to get training of first year B. T. C. Correspondence Course.

(3.) REJOINDER affidavit has been filed by the petitioner in which it has been claimed that petitioner has passed Madhyama Pariksha from Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Prayag in the year 1990, which is equivalent to Intermediate, hence he was fully entitled for B. T. C. Correspondence Course training.