GHANSHYAM Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent- Greater NOIDA.

(2.) BY this writ petition, petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 23rd March, 2007 passed by the Greater NOIDA authority by which representa tion of the petitioner was rejected.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was also entitled for allotment of the Abadi Plot and error has been committed by rejecting the representation of the petitioner.