STATE OF U P Vs. K.P. SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri S.C. Yadav, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the petitioners and Sri S.K, Mehrotra, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite pasty No. 1,

(2.) BEING aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 2.2.3.2007 passed by I he Stale Public Service Tribunal, Lueknow by which the claim petition pillared by opposite party No. 1 was allowed and the order dated 19.7.2007 by which the review petition preferred by the -petitioner was dismissed, the petitioners have filed the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

(3.) THE learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the opposite party No. 1 is not entitled for promotional pay -scale as till date his service has not been regularized, lie further submits mat the parity was claimed by the opposite party No. 1 with opposite party No. 3 whose service was regularized by the State Government and the Tribunal in a most arbitrary and illegal manner has allowed the claim petition preferred by the opposite party No. 1 and directed the petitioners to consider the case of the opposite party No. 1 for grant of personal promotional pay scale of Rs. 3700 -5000 w.e.f. the due date in accordance with the Government Order dated 8.8.1996.