ARUN KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE list has been revised. None is present for the applicant. Heard Ms. Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 4 and learned A.G.A., for the State and perused the record.

(2.) IT appears that opposite party No. 4 had filed an application under Section 156 (3), Cr. P.C. against the applicants before learned A.C.J.M.-V, Jaunpur. After hearing opposite party No. 4 that application was rejected by the learned A.C.J.M.

(3.) AGGRIEVED with the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 1, Jaunpur, in Crl. Revision No. 517/99 and the summoning order dated 28.5.02 passed by the learned Magistrate as well as the order dated 11.8.03 for issuing non-bailable warrants against the accused persons, the accused-applicants have filed this application under Section 482, Cr. P.C.