SUDHA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -Heard Sri B. B. Paul, counsel for the applicant and Sri Satish Trivedi, senior advocate, assisted by Sri R. P. Dwivedi, counsel for the opp. party Nos. 4 to 7.

(2.) A case (S. T. No. 368 of 2007), under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307 and Section 120B is pending in the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge, Essential Commodities Act, Agra. Complainant party wants the transfer of her case on the following grounds.

(3.) AS regards the allegations that in his statement P.W. Sanjay gave his address, which was different, given in the F.I.R. and the presiding Judge did not take notice despite being informed about it, the Judge has denied the allegation that no such plea was raised before him in any case. If the witness has given a different address, it may or may not be a matter of any consequence, which fact will have to be determined at the trial and this cannot be a ground for transfer.