ASKARI AHMAD Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) AMAR Saran, J. I have heard learned counsel for the parties on 16. 4. 2008 and reserved judgment. I had also granted time to the parties to file their written arguments within a week.

(2.) THE respondents have filed their written arguments but the applicant has neither filed any counter affidavit nor written arguments.

(3.) THE applicant's case was that he was a resident of village Abdullapur and was in possession of the aforesaid plots which was a waqf property and was registered with the Shia Central Wakf Board, Lucknow. THE applicant also claimed to be the mutwalli of the same wakf and the property was said to have been recorded as the property of the waqf in the revenue records and that the opposite party had no claim or concern with the land in dispute and wanted to grab the waqf property.