MICROCOMM INDIA LIMITED Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. A. K. Nigam learned Addditional Solicitor General appearing for respondent No. 1 assisted by Sri Anubhav Trivedi, learned standing counsel for respondents No. 2 and 3 and Sri Uma Kant, advocate appearing on behalf of respondent No. 4.

(2.) THE petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 3.8.2006 (Annexure-28 to the writ petition) cancelling letter of allotment/letter of permission (for short 'L.O.A./L.O.P.') and dated 21.8.2006 (Annexure-27) declining to extend the validity of L.O.A./L.O.P.

(3.) THE said letter shows that a sum of Rs. 4,20,898.00 was outstanding towards the petitioner on account of lease charges etc which he had paid subsequently as stated in the aforesaid letter. THE authorities however, vide letter dated 9.3.2006 (Annexure-19 to the writ petition) granted extension to validity period of L.O.A./L.O.P. upto 7.4.2006 with clear stipulation that other terms and conditions would remain unchanged. THE petitioner could not complete the work and through his letter dated 10.8.2006 (Annexure-21 to the writ petition) informed that some construction has already been made and that he is likely to complete First Phase of his building by the end of February 2007 whereafter full level production will commence in March, 2007 and sought extension of validity period of L.O.A./L.O.P. accordingly.