GIRDHARI Vs. BOARD OF REVENUE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -Present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 26.8.2008 passed by the Member, Board of Revenue by which second appeal filed by the petitioners has been dismissed.

(2.) BRIEF facts of the case are that the petitioners filed a suit under Section 229B of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act claiming their share in the property standing in the name of Panchu on the ground that the said property was acquired by Late Sukhlal and was a joint family property and being great grandson of Sukhlal entitled for the share. In support of their claim, they produced Suryabali son of Gulab Singh who claims to be Jamindar of the village. In his statement, he stated that the said land was given on lease to late Sukhlal. Second witness produced by the petitioners was Lalchand.

(3.) HAVING heard the learned counsel for the parties, I have gone through the impugned order and other documents annexed with the writ petition. I do not find any error in the order of the Board of Revenue.