LACHHMAN Vs. STATE O

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAVINDRA Singh, J. This application has been filed by the applicant Lachhman with a prayer that he may be released on bail in case crime No. 773 of 2007 under sections 302 and 506 IPC P. S. Koshikalan, District Mathura.

(2.) HEARD Sri Rajul Bhargava learned Counsel for the applicant, learned A. G. A. and Sri Brijesh Sahai, learned Counsel for the complainant.

(3.) IN reply to the above contention it is submitted by the learned A. G. A. and the learned Counsel for the complainant that in the present case FIR has been promptly lodged, the alleged occurrence has been witnessed by independent persons also, the prosecution story is fully corroborated by the post-mortem examination report, active role of causing ligature mark on the neck of the deceased has been assigned to the applicant, the accused Vijendra has been released on bail only because the allegation against him was that he discharged shot which hit on the leg of the deceased but according to the post-mortem examination report there was no gun shot injury on the leg of the deceased and so far as non-mentioning of the sections in the inquest report and other papers is concerned, cannot be given more importance, than ocular version, the discrepancy made in the inquest report and other documents, may be seen at the time of trial, and the trial, the Court may seek its explanation from the officer concerned. IN case, the applicant is released on bail, he shall tamper with the evidence.