VIJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Vs. VIRENDRA KUMAR ARYA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SHASHI Kant Gupta, J. This writ petition has been filed for quashing judgment and order dated 28-2-2000 passed by IIIrd Additional District Judge, Sitapur in Rent Case Appeal No. 8 of 1998 (Virendra Kumar v. Vijay Kumar Srivastava) where by judgment and order dated 10-8-1998 passed by the Prescribed authority i. e. IInd Additional Civil Judge, (S. D.) Sitapur, was set aside.

(2.) THE brief facts that emerge from the writ petition are as follows:

(3.) IT was further stated that his other son Yatendra Kumar is also doing a business of mehandi, hawan samagri and tea leaflet etc. in the name and style of "arya Industries". Since his son Yatendra Kumar has no independent suitable shop for carrying on his business as such he is forced to carry on his business from the one room of his residence, which is not situated in a market area but located in a very narrow lane due to which Yatendra Kumar is unable to run his business properly. The residential accommodation of the landlord is not at all suitable and sufficient to carry on any business.