KANYA DEVI Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION KANNAUJ

JUDGEMENT

(1.) KRISHNA Murari, J. Heard Sri Jagdev Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ramendra Asthana appear ing for respondents No. 3 and 4.

(2.) A statement has been made by Sri Ramendra Asthana that he does not pro pose to file counter affidavit. With the con sent of the learned Counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being finally disposed of at the admission stage itself under the Rules of Court.

(3.) IT has been urged by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that even though the revision filed by the petitioners has been allowed and the revision of Ma hesh Prasad has been dismissed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation but as a matter of fact his chak has been still wors ened and specific grievance that number of chak has been increased has not at all been adverted to.