KASTUBA NAND PATHAK Vs. STATE OF UTTARANCHAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 14. 02. 2005, passed by competent authority/appoint ing authority, whereby the petitioner has been punished after the departmental enquiry with censure entry in the char acter roll and further withholding the part of salary except the subsistence allowance during the period of suspen sion. The petitioner has further chal lenged the order dated 17. 12. 2004, is sued by competent authority/appointing authority to the petitioner, enclosing therewith enquiry report, submitted by the Enquiry Officer, for his reply/com ments.

(2.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties and perused the affidavit, coun ter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit.

(3.) IN the rejoinder affidavit filed by the petitioner, the averments made in the writ petition, are reiterated.