RAM Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ASHOK Bhushan, J. Heard Sri ASHOK Kumar Singh Yadav learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Janardan Singh Yadav learned Counsel appearing for respondent No. 4, Sri A. K. Singh, Advocate, appearing for respondent No. 5 and learned Standing Counsel.

(2.) BY the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being finally decided.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner challenging the order dated 10th March, 2008 as well as subsequent settlement in favour of respondent No. 5, contended that there was no ground to recall the approval in favour of the petitioner. He further contends that fresh settlement has been granted in favour of respondent No. 5 who claims to be a Cooperative Society.