PREM NARAIN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) C. A. Rahim, J. Heard learned Coun sel and learned A. G. A.

(2.) THIS revision has been filed against the order dated 26-6-1997 passed by the learned Special Judge (E. G. Act), Jhansi in Sessions Trial No. 320 of 1994 under Sec tions 307/323/504, I. P. C. by that judgment he rejected the application of the revisionist, accusation in that trial, filed on 26-6-1997. On behalf of the accused the said applica tion was filed for recalling P. W. 2 for further cross- examination. The Teamed Judge has rejected the said application on the ground that the said application was filed to delay the proceedings.

(3.) THE revision is, therefore, allowed. THE order dated 26-6-1997 is hereby set aside. THE learned Trial Judge shall allow the accused-revisionist to cross-examine P. W. 2 only on the point mentioned in his application dated 26-6-1997. THE learned Judge shall fixed up a date by issuing sum mon to the P. W. 2. It should be completed within a period of one month after the receipt of the copy of this order. No ad journment on any ground will be allowed to the accused-revisionist. THEre should be one set of cross examination as learned Counsel submits that one lawyer is repre senting all the revisionist in the trial court.