MOHD AHMAD Vs. SEEMA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) J. C. Mishra, J. Learned counsel for the opposite party was not present though the list was revised. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist.

(2.) THIS revision is directed against the order dated 8-3-1991 passed by Judicial Magistrate 1st Class Fatehpur in Criminal Case No. 90 of 1990 rejecting the applica tion under Section 127 Cr. P. C.

(3.) THE revisionist challenged the order on the ground that after coming into force of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 a husband is not liable to pay maintenance allowance to his divorced wife. Hon'ble N. B. Asthana, J. , who heard the revision referred the question to Division Bench in view of the conflicting decisions of this Court.