(1.) R. K. Mahajan, J. These two would be decided together. The matter regarding transposition of the State as ap pellant from the array of respondents would also decided in this case. There is one more interesting question which would be also decided alongwith the ap peals that if the State has not filed an appeal regarding the entitlement of the compensation as a lessor but the matter has been agitated by the appellant regard ing the entitlement of compensation by the respondent then what would the fate of not filing the appeal by the State. In fact the land was acquired by the appellant by making a request to the State Government for planned development i. e. construction of flats of various types.
(2.) IN order to understand the con troversy the resume of essential dates and facts are mentioned below: Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as amended upto-date (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was made by the Government in the official Gazette on 7-1-1987 with respect to 4 bighas of land situated at 2 Circular Road, Allahabad.