R N SRIVASTAVA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) MRS. S. Dikshit, J. Sole grievance of the petitioner is that he prayed for interim relief alongwith claim petition filed by him. Petitioner is working as Trade Tax Officer and since he was not being considered for promotion to the post of Assistant Commis sioner, Trade Tax, therefore, he preferred claim-petitioner and byway of interim relief he had prayed that his case may be con sidered for promotion ignoring punishment of censure entry awarded to him on 26-5-92.

(2.) LEARNED Tribunal while considering the application for interim relief rejected the same vide impugned order dated 3-3-97 on the ground that since the representation and memorial preferred by the petitioner against the punishment has been rejected therefore interim relief cannot be granted to him.