LALLU YADAV Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner has prayed for quashing of the F. I. R. in crime o. 456/96 under Sections 420/467/ 468/471 and 120-B of the I. P. C. relating to P. S. Kaiserbagh, Lucknow.

(2.) WE have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel.

(3.) ACCORDING to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, no offence against the petitioner as mentioned in the F. I. R. is made out. A perusal of the F. I. R. goes to show that there are certain allegations against the petitioner that he colluded and conspired with co-accused Surajpal and the constable of the lock-up and got fic titious requisitions prepared, so that he may be produced in court. There is no allegation as to what advantage the petitioner gained by going to the Court on the dates on which his no case was fixed. Nothing has been shown during the course of arguments by the learned Standing Counsel which may support his case that the petitioner was to gain some advantage by production in court on the dates which were not fixed by the Court.