ALOK KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) T. P. Garg, J. This revision/petition is directed against the order dated 11-3-1997 passed by the IV Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Aligarh, rejecting the application of the revisionist/petitioner for release of his Motor Cycle No. UMT 2913 allegedly involved in case Crime No. 251/96 under Sections 147/148/149/302, I. P. C.

(2.) HEARD Sri Ratan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, and the learned A. G. A. for the State. Both have agreed that this revision be disposed of finally at this very stage.

(3.) ON behalf of the petitioner the learned counsel has referred to the FIR (Annexure T) and argued that the number of the Motor Cycle is not disclosed in the F. I. R. so as to hold that the Motor Cycle in question was the one which was used for the commission of the crime. The learned A. G. A. for the State has not controverted the aforesaid contention.