SHIKHAR CHAND JAIN Vs. ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE plaintiff-appellant filed a suit Court below for before the reliefs:- for the following 1. that the defendant and the members of its establishment be restrained from in terfering with and demolishing the premises of the plaintiff in any manner; and 2. that the demand of Rs. 9,26,012. 50 paise raised by the defendant be declared illegal.

(3.) BALANCE of convenience also lies in favour of the appellant. If the respondent is permitted to recover the huge demand from the appellant, that might cause considerable loss or inconvenience to the appellant. If the respondent is restrained from making the recovery not permissible by the Govern ment Order, then it will be open to the respondent to pursue the lawful remedy against the appellant.