VINYTICS PERIPHERALS PRIVATE LTD Vs. COMMISSIONER TRADE TAX

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The case of the applicant is that it established its unit and was duly issued an eligibility certificate by the authorities concerned for exemption from payment of tax for a period of four years from the date of starting production, i.e., August 28, 1984. The said period expired some time on August 27, 1988. It is alleged that the Commissioner, Trade Tax, U.P., Lucknow on March 27, 1993 passed an order cancelling the eligibility certificate on the ground that the petitioner did not fulfil the condition for grant of eligibility certificate on the date of starting production, as such the same was cancelled.

(2.) As against the said order the applicant-assessee preferred an appeal before a Full Bench of the Sales Tax Tribunal, Lucknow. The Tribunal considered the matter and held that production was started on August 28, 1984 by the appellant-unit.

(3.) The applicant has contended that the existing conditions for grant of eligibility certificate was the notional date of starting production, i.e., the date when the raw materials were purchased or the unit got the electric connection. On that basis the applicant was given the eligibility certificate by the authorities under the provisions of Section 4-A of the Act, though the actual production at the unit commenced only on September 10, 1984. The applicant had also in fact applied for registration under the small-scale industries on May 4, 1984 in anticipation of its production being started at its unit. Under the existing conditions to give registration by the small-scale industry it was only when the actual production starts the certificates are issued. As such the authorities of the small-scale industries granted the registration certificate only from September 10, 1984 and not from August 28, 1984 when in fact the authorities under the trade tax has granted the eligibility certificate. According to the applicant it is suffering due to the two different conditions imposed by the two different authorities for no fault of its own. The applicant were given eligibility certificate on August 28, 1984 on the date of starting notional production whereas in fact the actual production started on September 10, 1984. The S.S.I, registered the unit on and from September 10, 1984, the date of actual production, though in fact the petitioner has applied much earlier, i.e., on May 4, 1984. The trade tax authorities while granting the eligibility certificate were fully aware of non-availability of the registration certificate of the S.S.I. on the date when they issued the eligibility certificate knowing that the same will come in due course. As a matter of fact the application was filed on May 4, 1984 much prior to the date of production or the date of notional production. They themselves instead of granting the certificate on September 10, 1984 granted the certificate on and from August 28, 1984. It appears that long after the applicant has enjoyed the exemption, as granted, which expired on August 27, 1988 and now being saddled with a huge liability under the amended provisions of Section 4-A(3) of the Act which was amended by the Amendment Act No. 28 of 1991 which has amended the previous provisions of the Act by inserting certain conditions on the basis of which an eligibility certificate could be cancelled even after the expiration of the date of such certificate.