MUNNA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) P. K. Jain, J. Heard Sri Siya Ram, learned counsel for the revisionist. None appears for the opposite party.

(2.) IN proceedings under Section 145, Cr. P. C. the Sub-Divisional Magistrate held revisionist to be in possession of the dis puted land on the date of preliminary order. A revision was preferred against the judg ment and order of the S. D. M. and the revisional Court allowed the revision on the ground that the Civil suit relating to the same land was finally decided by the Civil Court and no appeal was preferred against the said judgment. The revisional Court set aside the order of the S. D. M. and quashed proceedings under Section 145, Cr. P. C. .