ZAHIRUDDIN Vs. KABIRUDDIN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) P. K. Jain, J. List has been revised.

(2.) SRI Vidhan Chand Rai, brief holder of SRI Rajesh Tandon, appears and states that SRI Rajesh Tandon, learned counsel for the revisionist, is busy elsewhere. It is no ground for passing over the case. The record shows that the orders of the Court dated 17-8-88, 13-2-89 and 22-11-95 have not been complied with inasmuch as certified copy of the summoning order passed by the Magistrate has not been filed despite sufficient time being granted to the revisionist.

(3.) IN my view the judgment and order passed by the revisional court does not call For any interference as the court below has rightly held that from the allegations no offence is made out Hence, rejected. Revision dismissed .