RAM SAHU Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) KUNDAN Singh, J. List has been revised. Nobody is present on behalf of the applicant as well as for opposite party No. 2.

(2.) 1 perused the relevant papers with the help of learned Additional Govern ment Advocate.

(3.) THE learned City Magistrate, Kan pur, came to conclusion that there was no dispute regarding the building of the vidyalaya, but it was a dispute between the committees of management of the vidyalaya; each of them claiming to be in possession of the vidyalaya. Hence, the learned Magistrate passed the order directing the District Harijan Welfare Of ficer to take over the management of the vidyalaya till he received direction regard ing the management by Government or any Court. He also directed to allow the lady teachers, who were engaged in teach ing in the vidyalaya and had required qualification they should not be removed without any cause, if there is any charge of irregularity on the part of any lady teacher, in that case, action may be taken according to law against her after serving her with charge- sheet and affording opportunity of hearing. He also directed to get repaired one-side wall of the vidyalaya immediately. After giving other necessary directions, he directed to open the school for the study of the children. If any unwanted anti-social element interferes, the Court should be informed. THE proceedings under Sections 1 45/146, Cr. P. C. were dropped by hisr order and he directed certain persons to maintain peace. Raj Narain and two others, who were held responsible for creating dispute, were directed to furnish bail bonds and surety bonds and proceed ings under Sections 107/116, Cr. P. C. may be initiated against them.