R B SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) D. S. Sinha, J. Heard Shri K. P. Agar wal, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner and Shri Rakesh Tewari, learned Counsel representing the respon dent No. 3.

(2.) BY an order dated 26th June, 1974 the services of the petitioner-workman were dispensed with by the employer-respondent No. 3. This led to an industrial dispute which was adjudicated upon by the Labour Court IV at Kanpur, respondent No. 2, in adjudication case No. 74 of 1979. The adjudication culminated into the award dated 22nd December, 1979, a copy whereof is Annexure-8 to the petition.

(3.) ON other hand Shri Tewari, learned Counsel representing the employer-respon dent, contends that the findings of the Labour Court that no notice was given; that no wages in lieu of notice was given; and that no retrenchment compensation was given to the workman are perverse.