TURRAM SINGH Vs. DISTT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS ALIGARH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. P. Srivastava, J. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel representing the respon dents No. 1 and 2.

(2.) PERUSED the record.

(3.) THE petitioner asserts that the im pugned order is totally without jurisdiction as the District Inspector of Schools had no authority either to approve or disapprove an appointment as against a vacancy in a post falling in class IVth. It has also been asserted that the impugned order has been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice as no opportunity of hearing had been afforded to the petitioner before the passing of the impugned order. It has also been alleged that there was no person who had claimed any appointment on the ground of being a dependent of an employee of a person employed in the institution where the vacancy had occurred. In that view of the matter, it is urged that the order issued by the State Government could not come in the way of the petitioner.