SHEELA DEVI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. P. Srivastava, J Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Standing Counsel repre senting the respondents.

(2.) PERUSED the record.

(3.) THE petitioners thereafter moved an application on 18-9-1985 seeking recall of the order dated 25-1- 1976. In the af fidavit filed in support of the aforesaid application, it was asserted that Hublal had executed a sale-deed in respect of his half share in the land in dispute vide the sale-deed dated 21-2- 1972 in favour of Smt. Dev Kali, Smt. Shyam Kali, Smt. Ram Rati, Smt. Sheela Devi and Smt. Subhraji wife of Shiv Kumar and had delivered pos session to the transferees who were con tinuing to be in exclusive possession over the same. It was asserted that Hublal had no right, title or interest left in the land in dispute and the holdings belonging to the objectors had been declared to be surplus treating the same to be belonging to Hublal. It was asserted that the objectors came to know of the order declaring thp land in dispute as surplus on 1 -9-1983. THE true copies of the aforesaid applications filed by Smt Sheela Devi and Smt. Sukhraji have been annexed as An-nexures-4 and 5 to the writ petition, alongwith the copies of the affidavits filed in support thereof.