SHYAM LAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) T. P. Garg, J. Heard Sri G. S. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A. G. A. for the State.

(2.) THIS revision is directed against the conviction of the petitioners under Section 323/34, I. P. C. and Shyam Lal, petitioner, also under Section 324, I. P. C. and sentenced to various terms of imprisonment.

(3.) AS regards sentence, suffice will it be to say that Shyam Lal has already remained in jail for a period of about 4 1/2 months. The ends of justice, in my opinion, will be amply met if the period of his substantive sentence is reduced to that already under gone under Section 324, I. P. C. AS regards sentence of fine of Rs. 500 on each of the three petitioners, viz. Shyam Lal, Gauri and Triloki, the amount is reduced to Rs. 250 each or in default to undergo R. I. for one month. There being no scope for any inter ference with the conviction and release on probation of Vinod, petitioner, the same is maintained. Order accordingly. The three petitioners, viz. Shyam Lal, Gauri and Triloki, are given two months' time to deposit the amount of fine in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh, failing which the C. J. M. will issue warrants of their arrest and send them to jail to undergo the sentence awarded to them in default of pay ment of fine.