SHEO PRASAD Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Shri Akhilesh Kumar Tewari, holding brief of Shri Ashok Bhushan, learned counsel for the Revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.

(2.) REVISION is pressed or the question of sentence only. Trial court convicted the revisionist under Section 323, l.P.C, the revisionist was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months which was affirmed in Criminal Appeal No. 35 of 1984, decided by the Special Judge (Economic Offences)/Additional Sessions, Allahabad vide judgment and order, dated 28.8.84.

(3.) THE revision is, therefore, partly allowed and conviction of the appellant under Section 323, l.P.C. recorded by the court below, is upheld. THE sentence is reduced to a period of imprisonment already undergone and fine of Rs. 250 and in default of payment of fine, imprisonment for 15 days.