RAM KHILARI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) KUNDAN Singh, J. This revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 29-1-96* passed by the XII Addl. Sessions Judge, Agra dismissing Crl. Appeal No. 60 of 1994 and confirming the conviction and sentence awarded to the applicant by the Magistrate concerned under Section 457and380,i. P. C.

(2.) THE applicant is said to have committed the offences under Section 457 and 380 I. P. C. in respect of the incident which took place in the night of 15/16-9-89 and the applicant was arrested while he was running after committing the offences. THE Court below have given cogent reasons for convicting him under Section 457 and 380 I. P. C.

(3.) THE learned counsel submitted that no doubt the applicant is said to have been arrested while running from the place of incident which took place between the night of 15/16-9-89. THE applicant has been in jail for more than nine months and has suffered a lot of mental agony. THEre is no bad antecedents against him. It would not be proper to send him again behind the bars after a period of seventeen years.