TEJ PAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) P. K. Jain J. Heard Sri Dharmendra Pratap Singh. holding brief of Sri S. P. S. Raghav and learned A. G. A.

(2.) REVISIONIST Tej Pal was convicted by the trial Court under Section 279 and 304-A I. P. C. and was sentenced to RI for three months and one year respectively on each court. He was further sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- under-Section 304-A I. P. C. and in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for six months. Criminal Appeal No. 108 of 1993 filed by him was dismissed by IIIrd Additional Ses sions Judge, Bulandshahar vide his judg ment and order dated 9-1 -1984.

(3.) CONSIDERING these facts, in my view the period already undergone and a fine of Rs. 3,000/- would meet the ends of justice. Learned counsel submits that enhance ment in the amount of fine will not be treated by the revisionist as enhancement in punishment.