ATIVEER SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) C. A. Rahim, J. Heard learned Coun sel and the learned A. G. A. The matter is taken up for final hearing on consent of both the parties.

(2.) IT has been contended that the prosecution case was that Gaurav Pratap Singh was injured by a fire- arm but charge has been framed for attempt to murder to Veer Mani Singh. IT appears that no charge has been framed for the injuries caused to Gaurav Pratap Singh. So I find that the matter should be re- considered by the learned trial Judge.