ANIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) T. P. Garg, J. Heard Sri A. K. Shukla, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A. G. A. for the State. Both have agreed that this revision be disposed of finally at this stage.

(2.) THE applicant is aggrieved from the orders dated 1-3-1997 andl8-3-1997 passed by the Judicial Magistrate II, Ballia, whereby his application for cross-examina tion of Doctor witness was rejected. THE case of the applicant is that his counsel was busy in some other Court and could not come in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate. li, Ballia to cross-examine the doctor witness and that the applicant was prepared to bear the expenses or the doctor witness but the court aid not grant an ad journment to cross-examine the witness.