AMARJIT SINGH Vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION JAUNPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SUDHIR Narain, J. The dispute re lates to the allotment of chaks. The Deputy Director of Consolidation by the im pugned order, dated 31-8-1991 has made certain adjustments in the chaks of the parties.

(2.) I have heard Sri D. P. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri H. S. N. Tripathi, learned Counsel for the contest ing respondents.

(3.) THE petitioner has not shown that the Deputy Director of Consolidation passed any order that after making local inspection he will hear the revision again. THE local inspection can be made by the Deputy Director of Consolidation for two reasons, firstly to verify the facts as existing on the record and secondly, to find out some material on local inspection. In the first case it is not necessary to hear the arguments again in revision. In the second case when he obtains any material afresh and prepares an inspection memo, it will be necessary to hear the arguments of learned Counsel for the parties on the basis of such material obtained by him. It is not denied that at the time of local inspec tion the parties or their Counsel were present. THE petitioner also did not file any application before the Deputy Director of Consolidation after he made the local in spection to give another opportunity of hearing. In such a situation it was not necessary for the Deputy Director of Con solidation to again give opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.