REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

CHANDER ALIAS CHANDRA Appellant

V/S

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

TINGLAY V. DOLBEV [REFERRED TO]
PHELPS DODGA CORPORATION V. NATIONAL LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD [REFERRED TO]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. CHENERY CORPORATION [REFERRED TO]
JOHN T DUNLOP V. WALTER BACHOWSKI [REFERRED TO]
ALEXANDER MACHINERY (DUDLEY) LTD. V. CRABTREE [REFERRED TO]
BREEN V. AMALGAMATED ENGINEERING UNION [REFERRED TO]
REGINA V. IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL [REFERRED TO]
PARBHANI TRANSPORT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED VS. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY AURANGABAD [REFERRED TO]
DARYAO HURMAT S O SATWA MAHENDRA LAL JAINI ROOP CHAND BRUHAN KUMAR SADASHIV RAMCHANDRA DALVI VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
MANIPUR ADMINISTRATION MANIPUR VS. THOKCHOM BIRA SINGH [REFERRED TO]
MADHYA PRADESH INDUSTRIES LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
NARESH SHRIDHAR MIRAJKAR VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
SIEMENS ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING CO OF INDIA LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
GURCHARAN SINGH RAJ KUMAR SHARMA VS. STATE DELHI ADMINISTRATION :STATE DELHI ADMINISTRATION [REFERRED TO]
BABU SINGH VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION VS. JAGJIT SINGH [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JAIPUR VS. DAULAT MAL JAIN [REFERRED TO]
SUNDER LAL VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]
NANHA S O NABHAN KHA VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
JAI NARAIN HAR NARAIN VS. L. BULAQI DAS S/O. L. MUNNA LAL [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This matter has come before us on a reference made by a learned single Judge. The relevant part of the referring order reads as under :

(2.) After noticing the submission made on behalf of the applicant that an accused is entitled to bail if a co-accused similarly placed has been granted bail, the learned Judge has formulated the following questions for decision :

(3.) Sri V. P. Srivastava, learned Counsel for the applicant, has submitted that if an accused is granted bail a similarly placed co-accused should also be granted bail on the principle of parity. He has further submitted that not granting bail to a similarly placed co-accused would amount to discrimination and would violate his fundamental right guaranteeed under Article 14 of the Constitution. The contention based on Article 14 does not impress us. In Naresh v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1967 SC 1, a decision rendered by a Bench of nine Judges, Chief Justice Gajendra Gadkar after referring to Parbhani Transport Co-operative Society Ltd. v. Regional Transport Authority, AIR 1960 SC 801, observed as follows in para 48 of the reports :

Click here to view full judgment.

CHANDER ALIAS CHANDRA Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address