AJAY KUMAR KESHARI Vs. UNIVERSITY OF ALLAHABAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) R. H. Zaidi, J. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to3.

(2.) BY means of the present petitioi under Article 226 of the Constitution o India, the petitioner prays for a writ, orde or direction in the nature ofcertiorari quash ing the impugned order dated 7-2-1996 w here by the result of the petitioner of B. . A Part-II Examination, 1995 has been can celled and he has further been debarred from appearing in the Examination 1996.

(3.) IT is correct that from the record i. e. the admit card, it is apparent that something has been written by pencil on the back of it but the writing is not legible. The expert, who has examined the unauthorised material, i. e. admit card, has reported that the part of the said writing was utilised by the petitioner in solving the question No. 6. However, it has not been specified that what part of the said unauthorised material was utilised by the petitioner.